Difference between revisions of "Numerical Analysis of Interference Patterns"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The Fourier Analysis method of interferograms was created in 1982 by M. Takeda, H. Ina and S. Kobayashi and originally intended as an alternative to Moire Topography and the phase-shifting technique [1,2]. However, this method was ineffective at analyzing closed fringe patterns. A revision to the method, solved this problem by utilizing a Cartesian to polar coordinate transform [3]. The result of which could then be analyzed using the original method proposed. | The Fourier Analysis method of interferograms was created in 1982 by M. Takeda, H. Ina and S. Kobayashi and originally intended as an alternative to Moire Topography and the phase-shifting technique [1,2]. However, this method was ineffective at analyzing closed fringe patterns. A revision to the method, solved this problem by utilizing a Cartesian to polar coordinate transform [3]. The result of which could then be analyzed using the original method proposed. | ||
| − | The revised Fourier Analysis method does have several limitations. The first requirement is that the "measurement wave front be a monotonic function in the direction of the carrier frequency" [3]. For instance, if the surface to be analyzed resemble the image to the right were analyzed by the above method, it would look no different than a surface that decreased or increased from top to bottom. | + | The revised Fourier Analysis method does have several limitations. The first requirement is that the "measurement wave front be a monotonic function in the direction of the carrier frequency" [3]. For instance, if the surface to be analyzed resemble the image to the right were analyzed by the above method, it would look no different than a surface that decreased or increased from top to bottom. In order to analyze such a fringe pattern generated by such a surface, an additional fringe pattern giving the carrier frequency must be used. |
* requires carrier frequency, narrow frequency, low noise and open fringes | * requires carrier frequency, narrow frequency, low noise and open fringes | ||
Revision as of 19:02, 3 October 2007
This page is currently a work in progress.
Phase Shifting Technique
- requires three phase shifted fringe patterns
- the phase shift must be known
- carefully controlled conditions must be maintained
Fourier Analysis Method
The Fourier Analysis method of interferograms was created in 1982 by M. Takeda, H. Ina and S. Kobayashi and originally intended as an alternative to Moire Topography and the phase-shifting technique [1,2]. However, this method was ineffective at analyzing closed fringe patterns. A revision to the method, solved this problem by utilizing a Cartesian to polar coordinate transform [3]. The result of which could then be analyzed using the original method proposed.
The revised Fourier Analysis method does have several limitations. The first requirement is that the "measurement wave front be a monotonic function in the direction of the carrier frequency" [3]. For instance, if the surface to be analyzed resemble the image to the right were analyzed by the above method, it would look no different than a surface that decreased or increased from top to bottom. In order to analyze such a fringe pattern generated by such a surface, an additional fringe pattern giving the carrier frequency must be used.
- requires carrier frequency, narrow frequency, low noise and open fringes
- estimates the phase wrapped (via arctan)
[1] takeda et al 1982 [2] cuevas et al 2002 [3] ge et al 2001
Phase-Locked Loop Algorithm
- computer simulated oscillator (VCO) needed
- phase error b/w the fringe pattern and the VCO vanishes
Artificial Neural Network Method
- requires carrier phase
- non-algorithmic (i.e. must have learning phase)
- types of learning include: supervised, unsupervised and reinforcement
- multi-layer: input, output, hidden neurons present
The artificial neural network approach utilizes the ability fo
Genetic Algorithm
Simulated Annealing
ParSA
Here [2] is the link the the ParSA documentation.
The ParSA (Parallel Simulated Annealing) library is a set of classes written in C++ that can be used to solve optimization problems via a process know as simulated annealing.
The ParSA library contains many different types of
The Equation for convergence speed is:
|
|
(1) |
Where K and are problem specific constants and is a solution of length n. Using equation (1) and test runs on smaller problems of lower order, K and can be determined. Along with some suggestions provided in the ParSA documentation, progress can be made towards finding higher quality solutions at a much faster rate.
|
|
(2) |
The equation for warming temperature in the Aarts scheduler:
|
|
(3) |
Table of Proposed Runs
Clustering
SA Clustering Solver
Clustering Scheduler
- SA Aarts
- SA Easy Scheduler
Multiple Independent Runs (M.I.R.)
MIR_Solver
MIR_Scheduler
Use Combinations of the Different Solver/Scheduler Classes